You can quote me on this. I’ve been using the phrase and the idea behind it for years to explain that people feel more comfortable contributing new thinking, knowing their ideas will be well received; that psychological safety exists.
Let’s face it, over 15,000 scientists worldwide agree we need to shift away from ‘business as usual’ toward a more environmentally sustainable way of acting, living. With that big ask, comes opportunities to use imagination, to free thinking to create new futures.
Environments with psychological safety give new ideas a soft place to land. Not necessarily adopted, as put into action, heard and considered.
Psychologically safe environments let people risk new ways of thinking and understanding challenges, and stretch beyond ‘normal’ to consider alternative methods, outcomes, and activities without feeling threatened, insecure or embarrassed. In other words, out of the box thinking is welcomed; people walk the talk, they encourage using curiosity and exploration.
I recently read Inc magazine’s recently published article The Results of Google’s Team Effectiveness Research Will Make You Rethink How You Build Teams. It cited the importance of psychological safety as a determinant of effective teams. Other qualities are dependability, structure and clarity, meaning, and impact.
What if, in the lead up to World Creativity and Innovation Day, April 21, you planned to enable psychological safety in your environment?
Innovation is about people after all. New ideas need a soft place to land. See what you can do to be open and receptive to new thinking – yours and others’.
Make this a resolution for your creativity and innovation new year beginning April 21, World Creativity and Innovation Day. Keep at it.
If we’re going to inspire future generations of chemists and physicists, we have to restore the creative process in science education.
Sourced through Scoop.it from: www.parent.co
How important is it to teach the creative process in science?
The main purpose of the 50 Breakthroughs study is to identify where game-changing technologies are most required. The study’s main objectives are to:
- Foster a thought-provoking conversation about the role of technology in solving the world’s most pressing problems, and focus effort on the breakthroughs that really matter.
- Provide contextual background for technologists, so that they can determine how their work can address these critical challenges.
- Provide decision-makers a guide to asking the hard–but important–questions.
In this study, we consulted with a large number of experts, but not all of them agree with our conclusions. We are certain that new evidence will disprove some of our conclusions and analyses. Still, we are sharing our findings because the problems we all seek to address require urgent action, and we can’t wait for perfect data.
Reading this report absolutely qualifies as a WCIW 2015 activity, on the proviso that you take some action as a result. Game?
Can a robot be creative? Advances in cloud robotics—machines connected to supercomputers in the cloud—have given self-driving…
An interview with Ken Goldberg Professor of Industrial Engineering and Operations at UC Berkeley about artificial intelligence and creativity.
See on Scoop.it – Creativity and Learning Insights